Alexander

Interesting you're making these claims since you pointed out so vocally just a couple of months ago that Tacticsoft was pointing to our Terms of Service (which dont even include SuperMechs) and I had to point out they've been doing that since before we bought it and simply never updated it....
 

Tacticsoft's part on it by the way. May be missing something, but I am pretty sure this is the passage. It forbids making more than one *mech*. So ye be warned, 2v2 and 3v3 cheaters, bans are coming for you!
 
It's fair to say never in TS history has TS *ever* banned for multiple accounts. We're not straying for that policy for the simple reasons that, 
A. It's impossible. SM has too many players and its 2020 - people know how a VPN works. People play from schools too. Banning all public IP's would destroy our playerbase for no real purpose.
B. Its undesirable,  it sucks for ladder rankings yes, but it also makes the game more fun for literally thousands of players. Not going to suck the fun out of these players' gameplay without offering better ingame alternatives to circumvent stringent inventory and divine limits to make the ladder better for the 0.01<% of our playerbase who plays it. As much as we love that particular part of our playerbase as they make up our solid core. 🙂
C. It's unnessescary. For all the complexity and so on with banning it, if a player with a wallet comes around they can pay someone to lose to them IRL. Good luck duking that out. We had someone employ people to play for him on BD before, if the system is solid enough on multis but not on general boosting I suspect we'll see an advent of that behavior. 
Instead, stop wasting time obsessing over the same useless legalese that allows us to ban anyone just for the heck of it (read the bottom 🙂 ) and pointless arguments on multis folks. Many enjoy them, but most importantly if we'd start banning for that we'd have scarcely little players left in our core even if there'd be some effective method. Instead make new suggestions on an actually useful, fruitful topic: How to change the arena so it encourages and rewards really challenging battles and not behavior like "boosting", which is toxic for competition no matter what angles it comes from - legal or otherwise.

Works fine for me... I would try clearing your app data.

*cries in Nightmare*. 
 
Go take the stat difference between nightmare vs naga/windigo max and compare it to its weight. If you have a good way to use the extra weight, Nightmare is a very, very good torso. And looks good doing it. 🙂 
 
Of course a lot of builds are so light its pointless for them, that's fine. No nightmare for you!

You can get banned for using cheats or exploits.

You can get banned for using cheats or exploits.

*cries in Nightmare*. 
 
Go take the stat difference between nightmare vs naga/windigo max and compare it to its weight. If you have a good way to use the extra weight, Nightmare is a very, very good torso. And looks good doing it. 🙂 
 
Of course a lot of builds are so light its pointless for them, that's fine. No nightmare for you!

Interesting you're making these claims since you pointed out so vocally just a couple of months ago that Tacticsoft was pointing to our Terms of Service (which dont even include SuperMechs) and I had to point out they've been doing that since before we bought it and simply never updated it....
 

Tacticsoft's part on it by the way. May be missing something, but I am pretty sure this is the passage. It forbids making more than one *mech*. So ye be warned, 2v2 and 3v3 cheaters, bans are coming for you!
 
It's fair to say never in TS history has TS *ever* banned for multiple accounts. We're not straying for that policy for the simple reasons that, 
A. It's impossible. SM has too many players and its 2020 - people know how a VPN works. People play from schools too. Banning all public IP's would destroy our playerbase for no real purpose.
B. Its undesirable,  it sucks for ladder rankings yes, but it also makes the game more fun for literally thousands of players. Not going to suck the fun out of these players' gameplay without offering better ingame alternatives to circumvent stringent inventory and divine limits to make the ladder better for the 0.01<% of our playerbase who plays it. As much as we love that particular part of our playerbase as they make up our solid core. 🙂
C. It's unnessescary. For all the complexity and so on with banning it, if a player with a wallet comes around they can pay someone to lose to them IRL. Good luck duking that out. We had someone employ people to play for him on BD before, if the system is solid enough on multis but not on general boosting I suspect we'll see an advent of that behavior. 
Instead, stop wasting time obsessing over the same useless legalese that allows us to ban anyone just for the heck of it (read the bottom 🙂 ) and pointless arguments on multis folks. Many enjoy them, but most importantly if we'd start banning for that we'd have scarcely little players left in our core even if there'd be some effective method. Instead make new suggestions on an actually useful, fruitful topic: How to change the arena so it encourages and rewards really challenging battles and not behavior like "boosting", which is toxic for competition no matter what angles it comes from - legal or otherwise.

Interesting you're making these claims since you pointed out so vocally just a couple of months ago that Tacticsoft was pointing to our Terms of Service (which dont even include SuperMechs) and I had to point out they've been doing that since before we bought it and simply never updated it....
 

Tacticsoft's part on it by the way. May be missing something, but I am pretty sure this is the passage. It forbids making more than one *mech*. So ye be warned, 2v2 and 3v3 cheaters, bans are coming for you!
 
It's fair to say never in TS history has TS *ever* banned for multiple accounts. We're not straying for that policy for the simple reasons that, 
A. It's impossible. SM has too many players and its 2020 - people know how a VPN works. People play from schools too. Banning all public IP's would destroy our playerbase for no real purpose.
B. Its undesirable,  it sucks for ladder rankings yes, but it also makes the game more fun for literally thousands of players. Not going to suck the fun out of these players' gameplay without offering better ingame alternatives to circumvent stringent inventory and divine limits to make the ladder better for the 0.01<% of our playerbase who plays it. As much as we love that particular part of our playerbase as they make up our solid core. 🙂
C. It's unnessescary. For all the complexity and so on with banning it, if a player with a wallet comes around they can pay someone to lose to them IRL. Good luck duking that out. We had someone employ people to play for him on BD before, if the system is solid enough on multis but not on general boosting I suspect we'll see an advent of that behavior. 
Instead, stop wasting time obsessing over the same useless legalese that allows us to ban anyone just for the heck of it (read the bottom 🙂 ) and pointless arguments on multis folks. Many enjoy them, but most importantly if we'd start banning for that we'd have scarcely little players left in our core even if there'd be some effective method. Instead make new suggestions on an actually useful, fruitful topic: How to change the arena so it encourages and rewards really challenging battles and not behavior like "boosting", which is toxic for competition no matter what angles it comes from - legal or otherwise.

You can get banned for using cheats or exploits.

It’s not related to my enjoyment of talking to people but to energy. If I talk to people I get tired, if I am stressed or in a bad mood I go silent. Extroverts get energy out of talking to people and will do so more often when things are going down. 🙂

It’s not related to my enjoyment of talking to people but to energy. If I talk to people I get tired, if I am stressed or in a bad mood I go silent. Extroverts get energy out of talking to people and will do so more often when things are going down. 🙂

I really like the edit quality 😃

Mm mm, it's fixed. Thanks folks 🙂

Mm mm, it's fixed. Thanks folks 🙂

This is actually wrong for the same reason that some people think hackers would be ‘subtle’ with cheats when in truth they often cheat millions of tokens and hundreds of millions in gold they don’t actually need or use.
 
Professional hackers would never waste time on a game like this unless its white hat (for fun, and report it after opposed to sharing the method or profiting). Hacking is hard, long work and even if its just for some game accounts, it may just be a game, but it’s still illegal by law. You can go to jail, and the countries many hackers are from do not have nice, warm jails. It’s not worth risking that unless you’re missing a couple of cells up there. 😛
 
It’s usually young kids who found a tool and like to call themselves hacker, they’re not generally smart enough to hide their tracks. For sure they wouldn’t be able to resist hacking the biggest accounts to show off their l33t skillz. We’ve caught them trying a lot dumber than that.
 
 
Raul covered everything else. Don’t share your account if you want it to be safe. Fixing ‘security issues’ that only affect people who are breaking our ToS (usually for an unfair advantage in the game...) is not a priority.

Show us some builds you think are viable now the buff has arrived!

Show us some builds you think are viable now the buff has arrived!

Pardon my intrusion, but if you like AOT, Re;Zero is a solid one 😃

Can't you run the android app on chromebooks?

Fight me.

You as well!
 
Moved the topic a bit as it wasn't an introduction. But still, happy 2021!

You as well!
 
Moved the topic a bit as it wasn't an introduction. But still, happy 2021!

Whoever posts senko meme here proves that you are not strong enough to be a furry and should be ashamed. 

You can get banned for using cheats or exploits.

You can get banned for using cheats or exploits.