Jump to content

Deimos

Commanders
  • Posts

    520
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Posts posted by Deimos

  1. 15 hours ago, OvalQuilter said:

    Seems, you misunderstood the message. User can exchange (you need to distinguish between the concepts of exchange and trade) 10ย premium items for 1 premium item he wishes, it can't ruin the game's economy, because this economy even doesn't exist! Economy exists in real-time MMO games, where players can interact with eachother. In game with only arena exists balance. And this idea can ruin this balance (not only the balance, as I said in my message above).

    Nope, you can still easily make infinite alts and use all the spare L-M's sitting around to get all the meta items you could ever want. My suggestion is way better if something like this were to. be introduced which is highly unlikely in the first place.

  2. 4 hours ago, The_Real_Ramsay49 said:

    Ha mine dropped a relic and plat fort (but ofc the plat fort isnโ€™t useful cause I have 3 ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ)

    I could've used that, I have 3 of both the other ones but 0 plat ones

    4 hours ago, AftoKrator_ said:

    wow. divine spartans are showing up in rank 12 these days

    this is rank 11

    image.png.91d45778817e6bd8c714f07fc56c4ae4.png

    That guy just loves wasting weight on useless shit, huh? He could easily make a R3 build with those weapons.

  3. ird4pu2fm8s21.jpg

    On 1/12/2022 at 9:53 PM, Chicken Dinx said:

    @Electroย 

    Maybe I wasn't clear... My example was "trade 10 claws for one quad core" meaning the trade system I had in mind would be to trade 10 (ten) premium items (any) for 1 (one) premium item of your choice. Your first two rebuttals seem to assume a one-for-one trade (it would not be). Your third rebuttal is moot in general for this topic IMO.

    You're still wrong as the funneling from smurf accounts would ruin the game's economy.

    My suggestion would be: 5 premium items for 1 random premium item

  4. 2 minutes ago, Pavke said:

    Well, if more than half the people get rewarded, why call it a tournament then?

    I'm not saying half the people should get rewarded, I'm saying more than 8% isn't that big of an ask. Or a betting system would be nice next time, would make people more interested in the tournament if there is a big possibility to win something and you don't have to give away anything for free since there is the possibility for loss.

  5. 2 minutes ago, bongcloudmagic said:

    yes I mean buff

    and nerfs also

    Sadly I don't think that will ever happen. Best we can hope for is some new items that will shift the META slightly but no great changes are to be expected.

  6. 1 minute ago, bongcloudmagic said:

    But I do want to see a change in meta.Some of the weapons/torsos/legs etc rank 1-3 hardly use

    That's not how META works, some items are completely useless and will never be viable in the rank 1 competitive environment unless they get a buff.

  7. 5 minutes ago, Pavke said:

    What's the problem with having a chance to win something for free? People didn't complain when tournaments on Tacticsoft's forum were 5x smaller than they are now (for top 3) and on top of that we didn't even have a chance to earn a free pack just for participating. I don't get you guys...

    I'm just saying next time more people should get something, even if it's just a box not a pack. Btw if less people would've joined what was the plan? 2 packs?ย  The proportion simply seems weird to me.

  8. 7 hours ago, The_Real_Ramsay49 said:

    I asked Pavke way earlier in this thread if they were buffed drops, and he said he couldnโ€™t give info. Not saying I believe it with my whole heart ย but there could be a chance each pack has buffed drop rates ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

    That should be the case, if it's the boosted pack with like 3 legendaries I'd stand corrected since it would be fair otherwise meh

    5 hours ago, Pavke said:

    Since when do we complain about something that is free?

    Since it's like an 8% chance to win 5 epics, cross me off the list so at least others have a higher chance of winning.

  9. 1 minute ago, OKI DOKI said:

    Yes, I know those locations to farm for gold and also fortune boxes. Still for me OD6 suit my life. For other players can be good options those.ย 

    Fair enough, I just put it on autoplay and do other things in the meantime.

  10. 1 hour ago, OKI DOKI said:

    Don't get it. Sure, for people can look for fortune boxes and the drop rate are decent it can be ok to go for it. All depend on accounts. Some accounts are good on fortune boxes and some not. In my case my account is bad on fortune boxes and epics grants. I recommend to those can get fortune boxes then go for it. In my case no time and quick touch for quick grind it does the trick according to my life conditions. Gold, you collect good gold on OD6. If you are a pvp player in large, then no issues. For limited time player OD6 is the solution to get gold and XP fast.

    There is no right answer except that every player does have a particular life with particular conditions to be able to play the game on those ways. I do not have time so OD6 it is awesome for me. When I play for fortune boxes is a waste of time and fuel and terrible granting mix boxes.ย ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

    These are my two farming locations for gold and fortune boxes, no clue how long OD6 takes to clear since I hadn't done it in so long but I find these the most efficient, more than OD6 when it comes to gold per fuel spent especially the 3v3 mission for just 5 fuel. Also idk where you farm for fortune boxes but the 2v2 OD8 on hard got me like 4 legendaries from which 3 were L-Ms, I do believe it has one of if not the best fortune box drops.

    Sniฬmka obrazovky 2022-01-14 oย 9.19.26.png

    Sniฬmka obrazovky 2022-01-14 oย 9.18.45.png

  11. 7 minutes ago, Spoon said:

    Alright listen people, y'all keep complaining and shit over a game. You never get anything good from prem packs not to mention how long it takes to save up for one. It's like any competition, did any of the Olympians complain if they didn't get a medal? No, I though so. Everyone gets so excited because they hear "people who did not win still have a chance to win a free premium pack"
    Well, look on the bright side, I have a solution! It's called ๐Ÿ’ฅ grow up ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐ŸŒš

    Good one. Try saying that to the slaves. Want freedom or basic human rights? Grow up. We didn't progress as a species because we were satisfied with our current conditions, we fought and still fight to make them better.

  12. 25 minutes ago, Alexander said:

    Same, I do generally encourage refraining from rewards when possible - obviously it doesn't matter to Gato how many people join ๐Ÿ˜›

    Marija and Pavka wanted to give participants something nice. I think almost 10% getting a benefit from a raffle is higher than you'd reasonably expect from a raffle, but that's me. I don't usually expect to win those...ย 

    I hoped players would appreciate their attempt to give them something nice while still keeping it fun, but if more people feel the way you do, obviously they'll learn and the mistake won't be made again.

    I'm talking about the people making the tournament, might as well cancel it if not enough people join. Let's be real, that's why the rewards exist in the first place.ย 

    Over 60 people participated and the random rewards are less than 10%, a single pack will not make a difference for the majority of people so I don't see what's the argument against a reasonable amount of people getting one if you're going to do it in the first place.

    Idrc either way, I simply want a certain level of quality from a "community" tournament and being stuck halfway in the middle isn't it.

    That being said I obviously appreciate the work @Pavkeย and the rest of the teamย put in, don't think they have the say in how the rewards are gonna go so this is in no way directed at them.

  13. Just now, Alexander said:

    Frankly if people start whinging about rewards instead of having fun, then indeed next one will have no rewards at all (if there is a next one).ย 

    Just cut it out and enjoy, you knew what you would (and wouldn't get) up front, if you dont think the experience was worth it, so be it, don't join next time ๐Ÿ˜›ย 

    I think most people had fun and that's all that matters, right?

    I'd actually prefer that, only people who have a passion for competition would join so It'd be a lot more fun, then again you'd be the one whining since it wouldn't be many people lmao

    ย 

    I'm simply saying that if you're going to do rewards then at least do them right, not this clear bait which will obviously result in many people feeling frustrated especially since the initial premise made it seem there would be a lot more than just 5 packs.

    3 minutes ago, Pavke said:

    As with every tournament before (on TS forum), only top 3 got rewards. This time participants that didn't get a chance to finish top 3 are getting a chance to walk away with a reward too. Number may adjust in the future, who knows, it's the first tournament on this forum after all ๐Ÿ™‚

    Finally someone willing to listen to constructive criticism. I was merely making a suggestion for the next one but Alexander would rather do anything other than consider it for even a second once again.

  14. 2 minutes ago, The_Real_Ramsay49 said:

    Guys, I understand. 5 packs, thatโ€™s kinda small chances a small reward for a tournament. But we do have to take into consideration this tournament was made for FUN, not all for rewards. Would more rewards be awesome? Yes, it would be, a lot. But if you only want rewards, then youโ€™re looking in the wrong area. Sad, I know, but thatโ€™s just how this is working

    This is not an argument. If that's the case might as well have the next one with no rewards at all if it's just "for fun". Having more rewards only brings in more people and it's not like the game's economy gets ruined even if everyone got their 5 epics.

×
×
  • Create New...