Jump to content

fig

Experienced Pilots
  • Posts

    130
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by fig

  1. @Lord Gorgon

    Compare the stats of Mighty cannon wich is L+ weapon with desos stats 
    You will see that you are asking deso to have the same lowest damage with the mighty cannon .
    Also you will realise that mighty cannon have no res reduce  wich considered to be the phys advantage 
    Deso from the other hand have res reduse its energy free plus its heat damage !...so....its a joke this sudgestion really .

  2. 15 hours ago, Shoultz262 said:

    Disintegration isn't a bad weapon, it has better damage and is lighter than annihilation in exchange for a bit of backfire, plus it's energy free. But yes, it might need a small buff, not a big one.

    Yes I think it needs a buff ....have no pushing ...have no hugging like the saw...it isnt even cloose to shotguns and saws damages ...its only pottencial is the light weight which can solve you space problems with a same as anni weapon 😄

    In conclussion this weapon could be easily drop on an item portal ! 
    Its stats are far from deserve to be buyed with tokens .

  3. Actually ...I redownload it rn ....I have an old account with a fully maxed Tiger III and some smaller tanks as well.
    And ...as I just read ...this game isnt P2W I mean ...it is player friendly .

    And finally ....all the on line games are P2W 😄 ....at least I will give it a try on a better graphics game !!!
     

  4. 2 hours ago, SawzAll said:

    With all due respect, programmers have bills to pay and families to feed.  I have no problem with "P2W" being slightly stronger than "F2P."

    And I'm sick of "P2W."  There should be a third group of people: "P2S" or "pay to support."  Surely spending only $5/month isn't paying to win.  (If that were true, WHERE IS MY WIN?!?! LOL)  It's about supporting something you love.

    No one complains about people paying to not see ads on Crunchy Roll, that I am aware of.  Paying just a little to support a game you like isn't "pay to win."

    Sawz 🙂 I dont have problem  gato to keep the 10 phys meta players as well....I dont have problem to bring the old heat players as well ....BUT I have problem whne this is happening  against other free to play players .

    The resent balance it wasnt a small advantage ...

    Heats used to have 90 phys resist ....now they theoritically can have 160-180 resists .....this equals with more than 600 heatpoints more against physicals on a 3 rounds arena battle .

    This equals with at least 2 plats ...minus the 300 hps that they lost due to lesser hps of MPV ...means they have 1-2 plats advantage against the meta physicals ...add and the heat buff of the drones ....and their potential as heats in general 

    DO you know what that means ? it means a fair in general game against phys meta counters 
    and at the same time a huuugeeee advantage towards roudner physicals .


    Rounder physicals was playing against 90 resist heats and now they play against the double resist heats ! 
    With double resist energies as  well ( but for energies i cant say something because I dont really play it much )

    The recent ''balance'' was rounder physical mechs grave !
    And you know rounder phys might not pay so much the game but they pay as well !

  5. MPV and even more torsos should have en/heat stats buff .
    In general , what should be made is to boost the rounders on the arena !!!
    The recent buff was more like a favour to old top heat players that leaded the arena for 3 years
    rather than a  buff to really balance the arena 😄 lol 
    Rounders are weaker than EVER before  !

  6. In general ...rounder torsos and ROUNDER MECHS needs a buff  .
    The result of the recent balance was  heat mechs to have buff due to 160-180 phys resistance  .
    From the other hand phys counters (meta)  had a sacrifice of 300hps and a buff of 80 phys resist .

    In conclussion ...rounder mechs especially physicals are weaker as ever before !
    Because before 3 years they had disadvantage to  the top heats ....
    the recent months to the phys metas ...
    And right now  from both !

    I think the point of the balance get missunderstooded !!!
    Instead of boost  the rounder mechs strategy , buffed the old  op heat , the meta phys ,
    and made the rounders even weaker ! @SawzAll helppp !!!!

    I am afraid that torsos will need and energy/heat stats balance !!!

    I m really dissapointed realising that the balance team doesnt go on the right path !
    The whole they are doing is keep the old OP / ''p2w'' heat players satisfied .
    And not really support the rounder square and fair character that arena should have .

  7. @BossParody thanks for the post !

    1)  .....Boss , have on mind that not all the phys players are en-free counters .
    Rounder phys have really hard times !!!!! They had , and they still have .
    So I think the phys counters solution is somewhere else. 
    Perhaps to not exsists on the arena counters ? 
    This is my solution ...or rounders or pure en frees  due to arena filter ...this is the easiest balance solution towards me .

    2) In case that rounder mechs have better chances through balances I wouldnt say no to make armor brakers to cost energy .
    But remmeber ...rounder phys had problem and they still have problem ! so i dont think its really the time to make armor breakers cost en .

    3) -

    4) I agree ! E items needs buff !!! ....specifically weight reduce , for be able someone to make a counter to counters build . Try to make a rounder /counter ...you will see that you have no chances due to weight .
    But definitelly the E torsos needs the hpsn buff that @SawzAll recomended .

     

  8. Please post ONLY buffs you ve noticed or omissions lets keep this list clean from comments , analyses etc  so to be easier to be readed  or at least be taciturn and concise.

     

    FALCON needs resistance reduce ( the heat /en version already have , awkward considering phys potential advantage ) 

  9. True @Nefertary Meriten-Mut I was just thinking that might become something really better  on SM compare to the rest of teh games because I think SM havent go sooo deep on flip coin playing style...it still have the potential to change and be a top choise .
    But I agree with what you said totally .
    I am not sure whne the time will come and I will choose a better graphics game that will have the same flip coin character .
    Only the addiction of many years playing sm holds me and a few useless hopes 🙂
    Eitherway all fine 🙂 

×
×
  • Create New...