Flawed

You should have added "people" in-between "@%#$" and "like", otherwise it's just, uh... weird.

Holy cow, were you farming Campaign for several hours?
Also, use Nightmare instead of your current torso.

You should have added "people" in-between "@%#$" and "like", otherwise it's just, uh... weird.

I wish GATO games would actually care enough to at least reset the smurf's progress, because they are annoying as heck.

I wish GATO games would actually care enough to at least reset the smurf's progress, because they are annoying as heck.

You should have added "people" in-between "@%#$" and "like", otherwise it's just, uh... weird.

...Battalion Incinerator-like beings...
I didn't pick on you this time, Zho!

...Battalion Incinerator-like beings...
I didn't pick on you this time, Zho!

The problem is, some of us newer player actually like playing the game. Yes, it might surprise you, but it's annoying when I have to fight, or even get matched with a smurf (or someone with real powerful items). I don't want Arena to turn into "there's another smurf killer and another free win. Can I actually play SuperMechs anymore?".

The problem is, some of us newer player actually like playing the game. Yes, it might surprise you, but it's annoying when I have to fight, or even get matched with a smurf (or someone with real powerful items). I don't want Arena to turn into "there's another smurf killer and another free win. Can I actually play SuperMechs anymore?".

The problem is, some of us newer player actually like playing the game. Yes, it might surprise you, but it's annoying when I have to fight, or even get matched with a smurf (or someone with real powerful items). I don't want Arena to turn into "there's another smurf killer and another free win. Can I actually play SuperMechs anymore?".

"Let me tell you about that age.
"It was a hundred years ago, but that thing that happened scarred us forever. A portal of immense size appeared out of thin air. There was nothing anyone could do, except stand and watch. Towering beasts of immense size appeared out of the portal. They had flesh of metal, skin of steel, and weapons of nigh-infinite power. We sent the best men, but they were all annihilated by the horrors. It seemed all was lost. We prayed to our deities, but they did not deliver us out of this crisis.
"When all hope seemed lost, it happened. Giant flaming orbs crashed onto the surface. We thought this was another one of the metal monster's attacks, but it was not. Inside each of the orbs arose another mighty warrior: one committed to protecting us. They were armed similar the the invaders, but all in white. They charged at the invading horrors and destroyed them all.
"They then left the same way the came, entering their giant orbs and blasting off again. And that is the story of how the Socol saved us."

No, unfortunately, I don't.

You need better Cooling and Regeneration because it looks vulnerable to boiler mechs and energy drain mechs.

"Let me tell you about that age.
"It was a hundred years ago, but that thing that happened scarred us forever. A portal of immense size appeared out of thin air. There was nothing anyone could do, except stand and watch. Towering beasts of immense size appeared out of the portal. They had flesh of metal, skin of steel, and weapons of nigh-infinite power. We sent the best men, but they were all annihilated by the horrors. It seemed all was lost. We prayed to our deities, but they did not deliver us out of this crisis.
"When all hope seemed lost, it happened. Giant flaming orbs crashed onto the surface. We thought this was another one of the metal monster's attacks, but it was not. Inside each of the orbs arose another mighty warrior: one committed to protecting us. They were armed similar the the invaders, but all in white. They charged at the invading horrors and destroyed them all.
"They then left the same way the came, entering their giant orbs and blasting off again. And that is the story of how the Socol saved us."

I think they (GATO games) has given up on the game.

I thought about doing that too but uh... I could only kill one enemy since I was the highest I could go.
 

Ah... I wish I could have seen this before I completed the quest (I was doing the first Side Mission).

I think they (GATO games) has given up on the game.

I cannot believe that a discussion of this subject needs to be had with a moderator.  But, here we go.  I hope this does not come off as disrespectful to you or the leadership of this game or gaming platform.
Let's start with the most egregious of this response.
"....bit [d]umb that people are making such a big fuss out of it as you can always just play multiplayer later as you only need to get 5 wins per day for maximum rewards."
The simple fact that you feel it perfectly acceptable to advocate other players to simply play at another time to avoid this kind of game play, not only shows and points out that there is a problem that no one really wants to identify.  But also that players have to adjust their play schedule to avoid such issues.  While I am no game owner or developer, basic logic suggests that any game owner or developer would want as many players, in their game, playing their game, as often as possible and at all times of the day and/or night.  This attitude (while from a moderator) does not strike me as good business sense nor inclusive/inviting of the community.  Is this the kind of environment you want to portray?
Next topic,
TOS 2.2 states "You agree to participate in any conversation, contribution or conduct in a friendly and courteous manner..."
Is tanking ones rank to farm lower ranked players "contribution or conduct" that is considered to be "friendly or courteous"?  Is tanking one's rank to gain greater clan rewards "contribution" to the game in a "friendly or courteous" manner?  Is tanking one's rank to get matched up with lower rank clans in WAR's considered to be a positive "contribution" to the game or considered to be "friendly or courteous"?  I mean, if it is, then the gaming community needs to know this for transparency sake.
Next topic,
TOS 2.2.1 states "Participate in any activity within Services for the sole purpose of gaining Game Resources, without participating in actual gameplay...."
I understand where you are coming from, but I highlight these words for a specific reason.  I look at the word "services" as indicating any and all services that are provided to players within the context of Supermechs.  If I am wrong in understanding this, please forgive me.  I understand that this can be constituted as a "grey area" and I am by no means arguing with you on this subject, but I am going to question it.  The term "game play" is what can put this whole subject into the "grey area".  What is game play?  Would you or could you consider someone purposefully tanking their rank to farm for easy wins "actual game play"?  Is such a player, playing the game as it was intended?  That is the whole reason why I used the term "exploitation of game mechanics".  If this sort of game play was never intended by the developers or owners of this game, then the term "exploitation" is accurately used and such players could be classified as not "participating in actual game play" because such play was never intended in the first place.  Such an argument could be also used regarding those that outright cheat.  But we are not talking about cheaters here, we are talking about those that are using a game mechanic in a malicious fashion to gain game resources.  If this is an acceptable means of game play, then we all should know about this so we all can benefit from such game play.  Because such players are "gaining game resources" without playing the game as it was intended.  That is my take on this.
Next topic,
TOS 2.2.2 states "Participate in any activity meant for fraud or to encourage other Users to convey funds..."
I have experienced a number of players who have admitted that their clan requires them to achieve X number of wins each week so that the clan itself can reap the benefits of said clan rewards from X number of arena wins.  Would tanking one's rank to generate a number of wins not be considered exploiting game mechanics to gain resources (IE: tokens)?  Would that not be considered fraud?  Is that not gaming the system (loophole) as a whole through exploitation of the system itself?
 
I feel it safe to say that we all understand that Supermechs is not a large game and that Grato does not have deep pockets with heavy financial backing form multiple sources.  Therefore, there is not a huge team of people working to work out every bug, kink, exploit or loophole within the game.  Passionate players have to take up the reigns to help out the few developers by bringing up such issues.  If this is not considered to be an issue, and my questioning of such game play is not welcomed, please let me know and I will consider this subject viewed by leadership and disregarded.  And I will move on from it.
I thank you for your time
Knarf

I think they (GATO games) has given up on the game.

The cursed card. Should write a creepy-pasta about it sometime.